By Glen Newey
Why do political philosophers why clear of politics? After Politics: The Rejection of Politics in modern Liberal Philosophy bargains a hard and unique critique of liberalism, the dominant political philosophy of our time, tackling key concerns like country legitimacy, value-pluralism, neutrality, the character of politics, public purposes, and morality in politics. reading significant liberal theorists like Rawls, Habermas, Rorty, Barry, grey, Raz, Larmore, Ackerman and others, Glen Newey argues that liberalism by-passes politics since it ignores or misunderstands human motivation, and elevates educational system-building over political realities of clash and tool.
Read or Download After Politics: The Rejection of Politics in Contemporary Liberal Philosophy PDF
Similar social philosophy books
This e-book analyses the advance of Benjamin's notion of expertise in his early writings exhibiting that it emerges from an engagement with visible adventure, and specifically the event of color.
Regardless of the passing of a few 40 years because the unique book of Jurgen Habermas’s The Structural Transformation of the general public Sphere, the basic ideas that trained the ebook stay well-known and incredibly influential. lots in order that the time period ‘public spheres,’ as Habermas brought it, has at the present time turn into an finally foundational idea for assessing every thing from highbrow debate and ‘public entry’ feedback, to the functionality of race, gender, and sexual distinction in modern civil society.
This publication makes a speciality of what different volumes have in basic terms touched on, that's the components that give a contribution to the increase of definite individuals and concepts within the box of psychology. Bringing jointly famous specialists within the box, it describes the method of highbrow reconstructions that determines how we view old occasions, and why a few rules die in basic terms to be reborn back, in addition to why new rules can quick topple conventional perspectives.
As details platforms matures as a self-discipline, there's a slow flow clear of natural records in the direction of attention of other methods and philosophies. This has now not been integrated into the literature of the sphere. previously. amassing significant social theorists and philosophers into one quantity, Social conception and Philosophy for info platforms presents a historic and significant research of every that's either authoritative and firmly inquisitive about functional relevance to IS.
- Immediacy and its Limits: A Study in Martin Buber's Thought (Routledge Revivals)
- The Philosophy of Marx
- The Practical Essence of Man: The 'Activity Approach' in Late Soviet Philosophy (Historical Materialism)
- The Radical Attitude and Modern Political Theory
- Interpretation and Social Knowledge: On the Use of Theory in the Human Sciences
Additional info for After Politics: The Rejection of Politics in Contemporary Liberal Philosophy
But a more far-reaching and valuable product of the descriptive turn is criticism of the major methodological assumptions informing current practice. Politics can be the instrument through which a certain normative conception, of the ideal society, is to be brought into being. It is hard to deny that normative theory does make such an assumption, for unless the assumption is true, normative theory is engaged in a pointless enterprise. Diversity extends to conceptions of the political good. A corollary of increased self-reflectiveness might be an awareness of how assumptions concerning the possibility of implementing a certain political order need to be made explicit or challenged, and may reflect unacknowledged beliefs about the nature of politics.
My suggestions about the direction which future research in the discipline should take inevitably reflect my own theoretical commitments. But this does not mean that the research programme proposed must take a neo-Aristotelian form. Below I set out suggestions as to the direction which future research in the discipline might take. I do not deny of course that some interesting work has already been 34 After Politics done in the areas listed – indeed, some of it is cited in the annotations. Nor is it intended that the list be exhaustive.
13 We should contrast ECT and RDT with a rival claim, which simply provides a descriptive account of political disagreement, as follows: DPD: Certain key concepts in political argument often, as a matter of brute fact, give rise to irresolvable disagreement, for example, over their extension. It is important to distinguish the conceptual claims from DPD, which simply describes a set of political phenomena. The fullest and most recent account of the political significance of ECT and RDT has been given by Mason in his book Explaining Political Disagreement.